• About
  • Contcat Us
Thursday, June 8, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home General

₹10K Imposed on the Lawyer for Seeking CBI prob for Delivering Defective Shoes

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
May 9, 2022
in General, News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
0
Delhi high court

Delhi high court

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

The Delhi High Court expressed displeasure over an Advocate for again filing a petition seeking to transfer an FIR to the CBI investigation. The FIR was filed against a shoe company, for allegedly delivering a defective pair of shoes. 

The bench headed by Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta dismissed the plea with costs of Rs 10,000. The bench also stated that filing the plea after withdrawing a similar petition filed earlier is “nothing but a gross abuse of the court’s process.” 

Further, the court also noted that the petitioner, who claims to be an advocate with 31 years of experience, has re-filed the current petition despite the withdrawal of an earlier petition for a minor dispute being investigated in accordance with the law. 

READ ALSO

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

Furthermore, the council is unaware of situations in which extraordinary power must be exercised for CBI investigation, according to the report. 

Woodland sold the petitioner a pair of shoes in 2019. An online complaint was filed after the shoes were discovered to be defective. The shoes were returned for repairs after extensive communication. The Advocate filed a complaint with Karol Bagh police station after not receiving a response from the company, but no FIR was filed. He filed a complaint with the DCP but received no response later he filed a case with a magisterial court for lodging an FIR under Section 156(3), which was dismissed. 

The FIR was filed on December 5, 2020, after an additional sessions judge issued the direction. 

In his petition, the petitioner claimed that his right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution is violated due to the excessive delay in investigation and recovery, necessitating a CBI investigation. 

The state government argued that the charge sheet in the case would be filed in accordance with the law and that referring such a minor matter to the CBI at this stage would be unconstitutional. 

Further, The council for the state also referred to the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in ‘State of West Bengal vs Committee for the Protection of Democratic Rights,’ in which it was held that the court must use its extraordinary power “sparingly, cautiously, and in exceptional circumstances,” where the material prima facie discloses a case for calling for the CBI and to provide credibility and confidence in the investigation in incidents with national or international ramifications.

Tags: CBI PROBdelhi high courtState of West Bengal vs Committee for the Protection of Democratic Rights
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Chhota Rajan Files Lawsuit in Bombay High Court Against Netflix Series 'Scoop,' Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights
News

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

June 1, 2023
Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction
News

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

June 1, 2023
The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.
News

The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.

April 24, 2023
calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

February 24, 2023
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

February 24, 2023
pocso act
News

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

February 23, 2023
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
jug jugg jeeyo

Copyright infringement | Jugjugg Jeeyo movie stay refused by Ranchi court

June 25, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court Central Bureau of Investigation central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate gauhati high court Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry varanasi court

important sections in contact while drafting contact

by By Justuce Bench
June 3, 2023
0
Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation
Articles

In contract law, there are several important sections that govern the rights, obligations, and enforcement of contracts. While the specific...

Read more

Eight types of contract laws

by By Justuce Bench
June 3, 2023
0
Eight types of contract laws
Articles

Contract law is the legal field responsible for governing and enforcing binding agreements. Contracts play a vital role in holding...

Read more

Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation

by By Justuce Bench
June 2, 2023
0
Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation
Articles

We frequently engage in numerous agreements in our daily lives, ranging from buying vegetables at the market to installing and...

Read more

An overview of the process of rescinding contracts

by By Justuce Bench
June 2, 2023
0
rescission of contact
Articles

The term "rescission" originates from the Latin word 'rescindere', meaning to cut or tear open. It refers to the act...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • important sections in contact while drafting contact

Popular News

  • call data extraction

    How long Extracting Call Data Records is possible?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The concept pertaining to investigation, subsequent investigation, and the process of re-examining an investigation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • An overview of the process of rescinding contracts

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Is Watching Porn legal in India?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Can an Advocate Enroll for Multiple Bar Associations?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In