• About
  • Contcat Us
Saturday, March 25, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Alapan Bandyopadhyay challanged Central Administrative Tribunal before Delhi High Court – know more

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
June 2, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
Alapan Bandyopadhyay challanged Central Administrative Tribunal before Delhi High Court - know more

Alapan Bandyopadhyay challanged Central Administrative Tribunal before Delhi High Court - know more

0
SHARES
1
VIEWS

Alapan Bandyopadhyay has filed a review petition challenging the decision of the chairperson of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) to transfer his case to Delhi bench from Kolkata bench of CAT.

The former West Bengal Chief Secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay filed a review petition in Delhi high court challenging the decision of the chairperson of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) to transfer Bandyopadhyay’s case from the Kolkata bench of CAT to the Delhi bench.

The Central government has opposed the review petition and in response has told the Delhi High Court that Bandyopadhyay is indulging in bench hopping by filing the review petition immediately after the retirement of former Chief Justice DN Patel.

READ ALSO

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

“It is humbly submitted that from the conduct of the Petitioner, it is palpably clear and apparent that it is indulging in Bench hopping in the garb of a review petition and the present review petition which has been filed immediately after the retirement of the Hon ‘ble Chief Justice who has authored the judgment under review,” 

the government has said in its response.

Then Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh on March 7, 2022, dismissed the plea filed by Bandyopadhyay challenging Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Chairman’s decision to transfer his case from Kolkata Bench to Delhi was dismissed by a bench of

A review was then filed by him in which one of the grounds was the denial of Passover despite repeated requests from the junior counsel appearing for Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi.

The bench of Justices Rajiv Shakdher and Jyoti Singh issued notice on the review petition on April 22 by

The Court while issuing notice had noted that the request for Passover was denied by the then Chief Justice in the matter

Justice Shakdher had remarked that if it was the stand of the government that it is fair for the court to not allow Passover of matters, then the bench will record the same in its order and no Passover will be granted on request of the junior counsel appearing for the Centre also. Besides the Centre opposed the review,

Though the right to be heard by the court is a valid and valuable right, the right of being heard only through a senior counsel is not, stated central government.

Further, the center added that there is neither a rule providing mandatory Passover on the first call nor is it a “regular practice” of the Delhi High Court to grant such a Passover.

“It is submitted that right of being heard is a valid and valuable right. Right of being heard only by Senior Advocate is neither a vested right nor treated to be a right, violation of which, would entitle a litigant to seek review of the order,” .

read the response

It further said that if this ground is accepted to be a ground for review, all courts would be flooded with applications for re-hearing only on the ground that the litigant wanted to be represented by a Senior Advocate.

“It is humbly submitted that the present Review Petition is not maintainable as no lawful grounds exist for review of the said Judgment and the present Petition is nothing but an appeal in disguise to get the matter re-heard on merits and the same is impermissible in law,”.

Center said

The Central government has also said that there is no error apparent on the face of the record and the case cannot be re-heard because the petition feels a Senior Counsel could have argued it more forcefully.

Counsel for Bandyopadhyay

Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi along with advocates Kunal Vajani, Debanjan Mandal, Kunal Mimani, Mahima Cholera, Kartikey Bhatt and Gokula Krishnan.

AGS for the Central government.

ASG Vikramjit Banerjee

ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

February 24, 2023
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

February 24, 2023
pocso act
News

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

February 23, 2023
The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.
News

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.

February 13, 2023
Justice Hima Kohli stated that Artificial Intelligence cannot replace the role of a judge or a lawyer, but it can handle cases such as traffic violations and cheque bounces.
News

Justice Hima Kohli stated that Artificial Intelligence cannot replace the role of a judge or a lawyer, but it can handle cases such as traffic violations and cheque bounces.

February 13, 2023
Central Government notifies appointment of Justice Sonia G Gokani as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court
News

The appointment of Justice Sonia G. Gokani as the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court has been announced by the central government.

February 13, 2023
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
jug jugg jeeyo

Copyright infringement | Jugjugg Jeeyo movie stay refused by Ranchi court

June 25, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate gauhati high court Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry Uttar Pradesh varanasi court

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

by By Justuce Bench
February 24, 2023
0
calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court in India recently refused to quash a criminal case involving charges under Section 377 and allegations...

Read more

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

by By Justuce Bench
February 24, 2023
0
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

The Bengaluru court issued a temporary injunction against IPS officer D Roopa Moudgil and 59 media companies from broadcasting defamatory...

Read more

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

by By Justuce Bench
February 23, 2023
0
pocso act
News

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal against a Kerala High Court decision which had ruled that poking one's...

Read more

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.

by By Justuce Bench
February 13, 2023
0
The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.
News

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a petition filed by Shweta Bhatt, wife of former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt who...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In