• About
  • Contcat Us
Wednesday, October 4, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Appeals have been made to the Supreme Court in response to the Bombay High Court’s ruling that the NGT Special Bench in Delhi is unlawful.

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
October 14, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
0
Appeals have been made to the Supreme Court in response to the Bombay High Court's ruling that the NGT Special Bench in Delhi is unlawful.

Appeals have been made to the Supreme Court in response to the Bombay High Court's ruling that the NGT Special Bench in Delhi is unlawful.

0
SHARES
1
VIEWS

On Thursday, the Supreme Court decided to take up a petition challenging the Bombay High Court’s full bench decision holding that the establishment of a special bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in Delhi was unlawful.

Senior Attorney Dushyant Dave raised the issue, arguing that the NGT had lost all of its authority, and a Bench presided over by Chief Justice of India (CJI) UU Lalit scheduled the matter for hearing on October 17.

On September 21 of this year, a full bench of the Bombay High Court, which was made up of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justices GS Patel and MS Sonak, quashed and set aside five administrative notices that had been issued by the Principal Bench of the NGT, which had formed a special bench in Delhi for the country’s four zones of Eastern, Central, Western, and Southern.

READ ALSO

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

The High Court then decreed that only the Western Zonal Bench might hear cases involving the Western Zone, including those originating in Goa and Maharashtra.

The NGT alluded to NGT Act provisions, which specified that the Chairperson of the Tribunal could divide up business among the tribunal’s members. In any case, the special bench’s creation was only temporary and done for convenience.

The submissions, however, did not persuade the High Court.

There is, no question of any administrative exigency in having matters — unknown, unspecified and with no clarity — being selectively taken and cherry-picked for listing before any so-called Special Bench,

It was held
Tags: Bombay high courtNational Green Tribunalsupreme court of india
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Chhota Rajan Files Lawsuit in Bombay High Court Against Netflix Series 'Scoop,' Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights
News

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

June 1, 2023
Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction
News

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

June 1, 2023
The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.
News

The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.

April 24, 2023
calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

February 24, 2023
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

February 24, 2023
pocso act
News

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

February 23, 2023

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • important sections in contact while drafting contact

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Telangana High Court has ruled that notice under section 41A is required for offences punishable by up to seven years 

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In