• About
  • Contcat Us
Monday, January 30, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home General

Bail granted to Samajwadi Party leader  Azam Khan in Supreme Court – know more

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
May 19, 2022
in General, News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
0
Bail granted to Samajwadi Party leader  Azam Khan in Supreme Court

Bail granted to Samajwadi Party leader  Azam Khan in Supreme Court

0
SHARES
3
VIEWS

The Supreme Court in case of Mohammad Azam Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh granted interm bail and directed Khan to file for regular bail before the competent court within two weeks.

On Thursday the Supreme Court in case of Mohammad Azam Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh granted interim bail to Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan in a case related to forgery and criminal conspiracy.

The bench comprising Justices L Nageswara Rao, BR Gavai and AS Bopanna excersied their power under Article 142 of the Constitution passed the interim bail order granting Azam Khan bail.

READ ALSO

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

“It is a fit case to exercise powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India,”

said Justice BR Gavai.

The Court in the present context also directed Khan to file for regular bail before the competent court within two weeks

Azam Khan accused in a crimina lcase registered under section 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).

Section 420 of IPC – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property

Section 120B – punishment for criminal conspiracy

Acordingly Azam Khan had moved to the Supreme Court seeking bail and quashing of proceedings against him. Further he also prayed for a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to approach the Supreme Court before arresting him in future.

Khan has been languishing in jail since February 2020, facing 87 criminal cases ranging from buffalo and goat theft to land-grabbing and electricity theft.

Despite the Allahabad High Court having granted him bail in multiple cases, Khan continues to be lodged at the Sitapur Jail, as orders in two other bail applications by him have been reserved but not pronounced yet.

When Azam Khan in Feabruary filed a plea seeking interim bail before the Supreme Court which refused to entertain a plea on the ground to campaign for the upcoming Uttar Pradesh assembly elections.

The apex court in April 2022 asked Khan’s counsel to first approach the High Court for bail.

The present pleas, filed through advocate Lzafeer Ahmad BF, stated that Khan has secured bail in 84 of the 87 allegedly politically-motivated cases filed against him.

The present matter relates to a case of cheating against him in connection with grant of affiliation to a school he runs.

It was also submited by the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju to the apex court that Khan threatened the investigating officer (IO) in the jail premises.

“I will read the report by the IO. Khan said, “mai abhi marne wala nahi hu, paanch saal baad meri sarkar aayegi, phir dekhlunga”……Jiss SDM ne mere khilaaf mukadme likhwaye, usko mai chodunga nahi. Meri Sarkar aane do bas’,“.

ASG Raju had said.

“These are not threats, this is what politicians say everyday.“

Jjustice Rao responded

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal who as appeared for Azam Khan, had submitted that Khan does not run the school but is just the chairman of the school.

“I don’t run this school. I have not done anything. There is a letter which says that the custody of the petitioner is required for a rubber stamp? How can they seek recovery without recording statements? Now they are coming here and say they are threatened,“

Sibal had stated

The apex court in today hearing ordered that interim bail to be granted to Azam Khan and further direceted him to apply for regular bail before the competent court within two weeks of time.

The Supreme Court, therefore, disposed of the writ petition and all the other applications.

Read Order

Mohammad_Azam_Khan_v__State_of_Uttar_Pradesh-1Download
Tags: azam khanbailsamajadwadi partysupreme court
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Bombay high court
News

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

January 11, 2023
The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts
News

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

January 11, 2023
Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.
News

Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.

January 11, 2023
judges appointment to Andhra Pradesh and Karanataka High court
News

Collegium proposes the appointment of two judicial officers as judges of the high courts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

January 11, 2023
The Uttarakhand High Court's order to the CBI to investigate former CM Trivendra Rawat was quashed by the Supreme Court.
News

The Uttarakhand High Court’s order to the CBI to investigate former CM Trivendra Rawat was quashed by the Supreme Court.

January 5, 2023
Madras-HC-uapa
News

Can the blind guide the blind? The Madras High Court orders the TN Judicial Academy to provide judges with UAPA and remand training.

December 30, 2022
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
jug jugg jeeyo

Copyright infringement | Jugjugg Jeeyo movie stay refused by Ranchi court

June 25, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements legal news madras high court murder Nawab Malik patna high court pil pocso act public interest litigation Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry Uttar Pradesh varanasi court

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
Bombay high court
News

Advocate Neela Gokhale was today recommended for promotion as judge of the Bombay High Court by the Supreme Court Collegium.

Read more

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts
News

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium proposed the nomination of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts.

Read more

Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.
News

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium decided to confirm the appointment of attorney Nagendra Ramachandra Naik as a Karnataka High...

Read more

Collegium proposes the appointment of two judicial officers as judges of the high courts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
judges appointment to Andhra Pradesh and Karanataka High court
News

Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended that two judicial officers be appointed as judges of the Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In