• About
  • Contcat Us
Monday, January 30, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home General

Bombay High Court denies anticipatory bail in Student  suicide case

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
May 17, 2022
in General
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
Bombay High Court denies anticipatory bail in Student  suicide case

Bombay High Court denies anticipatory bail in Student  suicide case

0
SHARES
3
VIEWS

No doubt, he (teacher) can reprimand students, but not in such a language which would shatter the tender mind,

Last month the Bombay High Court denied anticipatory bail to the chairman of an international school in Ganpatrao Patil vs State of Maharashtra, accused of allegedly abetting the suicide of a class 10 student by scolding, insulting and using filthy language against the child.

The teachers can reprimand students but not in a language that could shatter their tender minds said, Justice Vinay Joshi.

READ ALSO

Gauhati High Court designates 15 lawyers as Senior Advocates including one woman lawyer – know more

Husband got divorced from the wife on the ground of cruelty after she was found to be adulterous: Chhattisgarh HC

the single judge held that “No doubt, he (teacher) can reprimand students, but not in such a language which would shatter the tender mind,”.

The incident took place when the deceased after he hit a football toward a girl by mistake and Ganpatrao Patil, the chairman of Symbolic International School, had pulled up the issue which took place on April 1, 2022.

The accused allegedly told the deceased that he was a “Nalayak, Dharti Ka Bojh, Zhopadpattichhap etc.” (worthless, burden on earth, slum-dweller).

The accused chairman also called the grandfather of the child to the school and told him to take away his grandson and that he should be rusticated from the school.

The High Court’s order held that,

“It is well settled that each case depends upon facts and circumstances of the case. Whether a person has abetted in the commission of suicide, could only be gathered from the facts of particular case. There can be indirect act of incitement for commission of suicide. On examining entire investigation paper it reveals that there are several complaints of the parents against the applicant about misbehavior with students. As regards to the case in hand, the utterances of the applicant are objectionable.”

After the child died by committing suicide, subsequently the Kolhapur Police booked him under Sections 305 (abetting suicide), 504 (intentional insult), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and relevant provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children).

The judge in his order besides taking into account the statements of witnesses and concluded that the accused had scolded the deceased in an “unruly manner.”

“In presence of teacher and the informant (grandfather), (he) again scolded in unparliamentary words. Prima facie it suggests that he has created impression in the mind of student to put him in deep frustration. It requires to be noted that there is a direct link of his act since within few hours from the episode, the child has ended his life by suicide,”.

Noting that the criterion for bail and anticipatory bail differ, the High Court noted that,

“A young student has lost his life in proximity from the act of the accused. Investigation is in progress. His custodial interrogation is necessary. No case is made out to grant pre-arrest protection, hence, the application stands rejected.”

The Applicant Advocate

Advocates Hrishikesh Mundargi and Pravada Raut.

Additional Public Prosecutor MR Tidke appeared for the respondent-State.

Advocates Ramesh Badi and Ajay Bhise appeared for the intervenor.

[Read Order]

Ganpatrao_Patil_vs_State_of_MaharashtraDownload
Tags: bail pleabomaby high courtjustice benchlatest judgementslegal news
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Gauhati High Court designates 15 lawyers as Senior Advocates including one woman lawyer - know more
General

Gauhati High Court designates 15 lawyers as Senior Advocates including one woman lawyer – know more

May 21, 2022
Husband got divorced from the wife on the ground of cruelty after she was found to be adulterous Chhattisgarh HC
General

Husband got divorced from the wife on the ground of cruelty after she was found to be adulterous: Chhattisgarh HC

May 20, 2022
Rajasthan HC Arnab Goswami got interim relief in a case filed by INCs Pawan Khera - know more
General

Rajasthan HC | Arnab Goswami got interim relief in a case filed by INCs Pawan Khera – know more

May 20, 2022
death punsihme row supreme court
General

Re consider conviction incentivizing policy for public prosecutors in Death penalty cases, Supreme Court asks Madhya Pradesh – know more

May 20, 2022
Private bus operators plead to continue tax exemption granted during COVID period dismissed by Kerala High Court - know more
General

Private bus operators plead to continue tax exemption granted during COVID period dismissed by Kerala High Court – know more

May 19, 2022
Supreme Court vacated stay on right to feed stray dogs- know more
General

Supreme Court vacated stay on right to feed stray dogs- know more

May 20, 2022
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
jug jugg jeeyo

Copyright infringement | Jugjugg Jeeyo movie stay refused by Ranchi court

June 25, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements legal news madras high court murder Nawab Malik patna high court pil pocso act public interest litigation Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry Uttar Pradesh varanasi court

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
Bombay high court
News

Advocate Neela Gokhale was today recommended for promotion as judge of the Bombay High Court by the Supreme Court Collegium.

Read more

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts
News

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium proposed the nomination of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts.

Read more

Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.
News

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium decided to confirm the appointment of attorney Nagendra Ramachandra Naik as a Karnataka High...

Read more

Collegium proposes the appointment of two judicial officers as judges of the high courts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
judges appointment to Andhra Pradesh and Karanataka High court
News

Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended that two judicial officers be appointed as judges of the Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In