• About
  • Contcat Us
Saturday, March 25, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Calcutta High Court, The jute industry is a national pride that must be revitalised – know more

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
May 24, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0
0
Calcutta High Court, The jute industry is a national pride that must be revitalised- know more

Calcutta High Court, The jute industry is a national pride that must be revitalised- know more

0
SHARES
2
VIEWS

The Calcutta High Court while hearing a plea in Indian Jute Mills Association vs Union Of India which was filed contesting the Jute Commissioner’s rate for mills to procure raw jute.

The Calcutta High Court has stated that the jute industry is a national pride and that all stakeholders must work together to not only save but also revive it.

Taking note of the financial losses suffered by jute mills, the bench comprising Justice Amrita Sinha ruled that all government agencies must support the Jute Commissioner in prosecuting individuals who hoard the raw fibre.

READ ALSO

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

All the parties who are a part of the jute industry need to adopt a holistic approach and devise means not only to save but to revive the industry which is the pride of our country, especially Bengal. Reviving the industry will undoubtedly be a herculean task and joint effort of all stake holders is extremely important,”

The Bench Said

The Jute Commissioner is compelled by law to lead from the front, according to the Court.

The Indian Jute Mills Association had filed a lawsuit challenging a notification issued by the Union Ministry of Textiles’ Jute Commissioner in June of last year under the Jute Textiles Control Order of 2016.

According to the notification, the Jute Commissioner has set a suitable price for raw jute in West Bengal for the TD-5 variety at INR 6,500 per quintal.

The notification said that no dealer, trader, agency, or supplier, or any other person, shall sell or offer to sell any person or agency, and no person, agency, or firm shall offer to purchase or purchase any raw jute at a price higher than the notification’s reasonable price.

The petitioners, who included over 35 jute mills, said that the commissioner’s rate was not reasonable since it did not account for freight, transit, processing, and storage costs of raw jute, and therefore was in violation of the 2016 Control Order.

It was argued that the fixed price is ridiculously low and cannot be implemented even with coercive means.

The petitioners claimed that because the set cost was not reasonable, they were obliged to pay more for raw jute.

Because they are unable to sell their finished products on the open market and must instead sell finished jute bags in bulk to the government, most mills have been forced to close.

As a result, a prayer was said to ask the authorities to re-set the prices.

After hearing the arguments, the single-judge remarked that the Court was not an expert body to set the price of any goods, and that the Jute Commissioner was in charge of that.

“An onerous duty is cast upon the Jute Commissioner. It is not only his statutory duty but an obligation to fix the price of raw jute after taking into account the relevant considerations and to adopt all necessary methods to implement the said price, otherwise the price fixed will lose its relevance and the purchasers will be left at the mercy of the traders who are openly selling the product at rates higher than the notified rate,”

The Bench Said

The judge went on to say that “something is wrong somewhere” because the price of raw jute was rising rather than falling.

“There must be some loop holes which are required to be plugged. But who will bell the cat, is possibly the next relevant question. Taking advantage of the difference between the State and the Central, the hoarders and black marketers are taking active role in selling raw jute at an exorbitant rate,” 

The Bench stated.

The judgement went on to say that increasing the notification rate would not solve the mills’ problems.

“A check and balance is to be maintained. With a rise in the notified rate, the government will be liable to reimburse the mill owners the higher rate, which in turn will put a pressure on the exchequer and most likely, the higher rate will not reach the hands of the poor cultivators and will fizzle out in the middle rung,”

The Bench Said.

As a result, the judge ordered the Jute Commissioner to take proactive measures and impose strict penalties in order to execute the announced rate.

Even yet, if it appears that the notified rate will not be met, the Court requested that he examine and re-fix the rate after taking into account the relevant considerations listed in the 2016 Control Order.

The petitioners were represented by senior counsel Abhrajit Mitra and attorneys Rajshree Kaharia, Sarvopriyo Mukherjee, Satadeep Bhattacharyya, and Uttam Sharma.

The Union government was represented by Assistant Solicitor General Dhiraj Trivedi and attorneys Dibashis Basu and Arun Bandyopadhyay.

The Jute Commissioner was represented by Senior Advocate Jayanta Kumar Mitra, Joydip Banerjee, and Rahul Karmakar.

The State was represented by Susovan Sengupta and Manas Kumar Sadhu.

The remaining respondents were represented by lawyers Saikat Basu, Abhishek Acharya, Soumya Mazumdar, Kumar Gupta, and Pranav Sharma.

Read Judgment

Indian_Jute_Mills_Association_vs_Union_of_IndiaDownload
Tags: calcutta high courtIndian Jute Mills AssociationIndian Jute Mills Association vs Union Of IndiajuteJute Commissioner
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

February 24, 2023
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

February 24, 2023
pocso act
News

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

February 23, 2023
The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.
News

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.

February 13, 2023
Justice Hima Kohli stated that Artificial Intelligence cannot replace the role of a judge or a lawyer, but it can handle cases such as traffic violations and cheque bounces.
News

Justice Hima Kohli stated that Artificial Intelligence cannot replace the role of a judge or a lawyer, but it can handle cases such as traffic violations and cheque bounces.

February 13, 2023
Central Government notifies appointment of Justice Sonia G Gokani as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court
News

The appointment of Justice Sonia G. Gokani as the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court has been announced by the central government.

February 13, 2023
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
jug jugg jeeyo

Copyright infringement | Jugjugg Jeeyo movie stay refused by Ranchi court

June 25, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate gauhati high court Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry Uttar Pradesh varanasi court

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

by By Justuce Bench
February 24, 2023
0
calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court in India recently refused to quash a criminal case involving charges under Section 377 and allegations...

Read more

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

by By Justuce Bench
February 24, 2023
0
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

The Bengaluru court issued a temporary injunction against IPS officer D Roopa Moudgil and 59 media companies from broadcasting defamatory...

Read more

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

by By Justuce Bench
February 23, 2023
0
pocso act
News

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal against a Kerala High Court decision which had ruled that poking one's...

Read more

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.

by By Justuce Bench
February 13, 2023
0
The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.
News

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a petition filed by Shweta Bhatt, wife of former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt who...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In