• About
  • Contcat Us
Monday, January 30, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

CBI opposes Anil Deshmukhs default bail, claiming charge sheet not pending

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
June 14, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
CBI opposes Anil Deshmukhs default bail, claiming charge sheet not pending

CBI opposes Anil Deshmukhs default bail, claiming charge sheet not pending

0
SHARES
2
VIEWS

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has opposed former Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh and his aide Sanjeev Palande’s request for default bail in a corruption case filed by the central agency against them in a Mumbai court.

Deshmukh and Palande sought bail on the grounds that the CBI’s chargesheet was incomplete, as it was only 59 pages long, and that papers and annexures that should have been included in the chargesheet were never filed.

As a result, they argued they were entitled to use the statutory bail remedy provided by Section 167 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

READ ALSO

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

The CBI, on the other hand, has refuted this claim, claiming that the chargesheet is not incomplete as reported.

“The supply of the final report to the accused under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has no nexus with Section 167(2) of the CrPC for default bail. It is wrong to contend that the investigation has not been completed within 60 days of the arrest of the accused. The police report has been filed by CBI before the Court on June 2 as is borne out by the roznama,” 

CBI Stated

It was also claimed that, as required by law, the Special Court had received a thorough police report in terms of the chargesheet.

Mere delay on account of other compliance to file the documents relied upon with the police report cannot take away the fact that a police report has, in fact, been filed within the stipulated period prescribed by law,” 

CBI further stated

The CBI maintained that simply because materials were not filed with the chargesheet did not indicate it was incomplete.

Furthermore, according to the CBI, the court that ordered them to deposit the remaining documents on or before June 7 did so after examining the charge sheet brought before it.

Deshmukh and Palande also took issue with the CBI’s failure to provide them with copies of the chargesheet and other documents, as required by Section 207 of the CrPC.

The CBI disputed this allegation, claiming that the CrPC merely requires the filing of the chargesheet within a specified time frame and that the accused does not have a right to a copy of the chargesheet.

Based on the findings of the preliminary probe into Dr. Jaishri Patil’s accusation, the CBI filed an offence against Deshmukh and unknown others.

The investigation was launched when the Bombay High Court issued a direction to that effect on April 5, 2021, in response to a petition submitted by Param Bir Singh, former Commissioner of Mumbai Police.

Deshmukh was identified in the FIR after the probe, along with his personal secretary Sanjeev Palande, personal assistant Kundan Shinde, and fired Mumbai Police officer Sachin Waze, whose identities were later added.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) first arrested Deshmukh and others in November 2021 in connection with the same investigation, but for money laundering offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The CBI later detained them in the first week of April of this year.

They were detained by the CBI till April 16, when they were remanded to judicial custody.

Tags: Anil DeshmukhCentral Bureau of InvestigationChargesheetcorruption casedefault bailMaharashtra Home MinisterMumbai Court
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Bombay high court
News

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

January 11, 2023
The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts
News

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

January 11, 2023
Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.
News

Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.

January 11, 2023
judges appointment to Andhra Pradesh and Karanataka High court
News

Collegium proposes the appointment of two judicial officers as judges of the high courts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

January 11, 2023
The Uttarakhand High Court's order to the CBI to investigate former CM Trivendra Rawat was quashed by the Supreme Court.
News

The Uttarakhand High Court’s order to the CBI to investigate former CM Trivendra Rawat was quashed by the Supreme Court.

January 5, 2023
Madras-HC-uapa
News

Can the blind guide the blind? The Madras High Court orders the TN Judicial Academy to provide judges with UAPA and remand training.

December 30, 2022
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
jug jugg jeeyo

Copyright infringement | Jugjugg Jeeyo movie stay refused by Ranchi court

June 25, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements legal news madras high court murder Nawab Malik patna high court pil pocso act public interest litigation Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry Uttar Pradesh varanasi court

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
Bombay high court
News

Advocate Neela Gokhale was today recommended for promotion as judge of the Bombay High Court by the Supreme Court Collegium.

Read more

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts
News

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium proposed the nomination of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts.

Read more

Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.
News

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium decided to confirm the appointment of attorney Nagendra Ramachandra Naik as a Karnataka High...

Read more

Collegium proposes the appointment of two judicial officers as judges of the high courts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
judges appointment to Andhra Pradesh and Karanataka High court
News

Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended that two judicial officers be appointed as judges of the Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In