• About
  • Contcat Us
Wednesday, December 6, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Courses
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Courses
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Courts should review wills from the perspective of laypeople rather than lawyers: Delhi High Court

S Sreedhar by S Sreedhar
October 14, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
0
Courts should review wills from the perspective of laypeople rather than lawyers: Delhi High Court

Courts should review wills from the perspective of laypeople rather than lawyers: Delhi High Court

0
SHARES
21
VIEWS

In the recent case of Vikrant Kapila & Anr v. Pankaja Panda & Ors., the Delhi High Court division bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Saurabh Banerjee declared that a will must be interpreted harmoniously, giving each clause equal weight, benefit, and uniformity.

The Court stated that each clause in a will has a unique value, much as each sailor on a ship has a unique duty to perform, and that clauses in wills are like sailors on a ship sailing in the same direction.

In our opinion, for reaching a final culmination with respect to interpretation of a Will it is imperative for the Court to look at it from the eyes of a layman rather than a lawman,”

the Court said.

The Court stated that disagreements about how to interpret a will have been brought before the courts from the beginning of time, and that although these doors have been successfully shut by successive rulings, the problem will sadly never be resolved.

READ ALSO

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

The Court went on to say that in order to reach a decision as practically as feasible, it must look behind the curtain and raise the veil in order to determine the testator’s true intention and to acknowledge the beneficiaries’ rights to adjudicate disputes.

The Court further stated that it is important to keep in mind that certain clauses in the Will may overlap or conflict with one another. Because these clauses cannot be changed and the testator cannot be asked for an explanation, care must be taken to ensure that these clauses do not contradict one another.

n case the clause(s) are inconsistent and a divergent meaning is possible, the order of precedence should be followed, i.e., the more powerful/meaningful clause(s) is to take precedence over the less meaningful clause(s). When there is a clause bequeathing absolute rights then the same cannot be followed by other clause(s) with restricted rights. An absolute right is an outright recognition which cannot be fettered by imposing a condition in the form of a restrictive right,”

The Court Held

The bench ruled that when a clause’s words can be read in multiple ways, it is best to choose and interpret them in a way that is most likely to be plausible and constructive for everyone as a whole in order to draw a “single straight line” with no breaks rather than reverting to an interpretation that is implausibly destructive and works against everyone’s best interests.

It further stated that all words should be taken into consideration as essential and that all sentences should be reconciled with one another and read collectively as if they were all a part of the same document.

The bench explained that if doing the same thing is not practicable for some reason, the better interpretation should be used to bring an end to the conflicting circumstances.

The appeal, which contested the sole judge’s decision and preliminary decree based on Sheila Kapila’s will, which set aside a 25% equal portion for each of her children before selling it and dividing the revenues among them, was before the bench.

Conflict erupted because Sheila Kapila’s son passed away and left a Will leaving little for his two children and everything to his second. They submitted an appeal arguing that Sheila Kapila’s four children only received a limited bequest under her will but they, together with the rest of the testator’s grandchildren, received an absolute bequest.

The judges stated at the outset that,

A Will will be a Will only when it will lay to rest the wishes of who is at rest,” and that it will be their endeavour to proceed so that the “will of who lays at rest is put to rest”

Following consideration of the arguments, the court concluded that there is an absolute bequest in favour of the four children and that the phrases and language employed in the will are neither cryptic or ambiguous.

Finding no infirmity, perversity or illegality in the Impugned Judgment dated 10.05.2022 passed by the Learned Single Judge qua the interpretation of the Will in question, we find there are no grounds of interference by this Court.

As a result, the appeals were dismissed.

For the appellants, senior advocate Sudhanshu Batra was joined by advocates Gagan Mathur, Madhu Sehgal, and Rishi Sehgal.

Respondents were defended by Senior Advocates Ashish Dholakia and Arvind Nigam, as well as Advocates Jai Sahai Endlaw, Ashish Kumar, Niharika Ahluwalia, Ishita Deswal, Astha Badoriya, and Mansi Sharma.

[Read Judgment]

Vikrant Kapila & Anr v Pankaja Panda & Ors.pdf
Tags: delhi high courtInterpretation of WillJustice Saurabh BanerjeeJustice Suresh Kumar KaitTestatorWILL
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Chhota Rajan Files Lawsuit in Bombay High Court Against Netflix Series 'Scoop,' Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights
News

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

June 1, 2023
Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction
News

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

June 1, 2023
The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.
News

The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.

April 24, 2023
calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

February 24, 2023
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

February 24, 2023
pocso act
News

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

February 23, 2023
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
multiple bar association enrollment

Can an Advocate Enroll for Multiple Bar Associations?

May 8, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court Central Bureau of Investigation central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate gauhati high court Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry varanasi court

Top Career Options for Advocates in India in 2024

by S Sreedhar
December 5, 2023
0
advocate carrier options
Articles

Choosing the right career path in the legal field can be a daunting decision, given various factors to consider. This...

Read more

procedure to get anticipatory bail in the 498a case.

by S Sreedhar
December 3, 2023
0
procedure to get anticipatory bail in the 498a case.
Articles

What is the procedure to get anticipatory bail in the 498a case?ORHow to get anticipatory bail in the 498a case?...

Read more

How to file for mutual consent divorce in India

by S Sreedhar
December 1, 2023
0
Mutual Consent Divorce
Articles

Divorce is a legal procedure that marks the termination of a marital union between two adults

Read more

important sections in contact while drafting contact

by S Sreedhar
June 3, 2023
0
Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation
Articles

In contract law, there are several important sections that govern the rights, obligations, and enforcement of contracts. While the specific...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • Top Career Options for Advocates in India in 2024

Popular News

  • La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

    La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • procedure to get anticipatory bail in the 498a case.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Sachin S Former Assistant General Counsel at Flipkart joins RazorPay as Director Legal – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Top Career Options for Advocates in India in 2024

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Courses

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In