• About
  • Contcat Us
Wednesday, May 21, 2025
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home News

Courts should review wills from the perspective of laypeople rather than lawyers: Delhi High Court

S Sreedhar by S Sreedhar
October 14, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
0
Courts should review wills from the perspective of laypeople rather than lawyers: Delhi High Court

Courts should review wills from the perspective of laypeople rather than lawyers: Delhi High Court

0
SHARES
35
VIEWS

In the recent case of Vikrant Kapila & Anr v. Pankaja Panda & Ors., the Delhi High Court division bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Saurabh Banerjee declared that a will must be interpreted harmoniously, giving each clause equal weight, benefit, and uniformity.

The Court stated that each clause in a will has a unique value, much as each sailor on a ship has a unique duty to perform, and that clauses in wills are like sailors on a ship sailing in the same direction.

In our opinion, for reaching a final culmination with respect to interpretation of a Will it is imperative for the Court to look at it from the eyes of a layman rather than a lawman,”

the Court said.

The Court stated that disagreements about how to interpret a will have been brought before the courts from the beginning of time, and that although these doors have been successfully shut by successive rulings, the problem will sadly never be resolved.

READ ALSO

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

The Court went on to say that in order to reach a decision as practically as feasible, it must look behind the curtain and raise the veil in order to determine the testator’s true intention and to acknowledge the beneficiaries’ rights to adjudicate disputes.

The Court further stated that it is important to keep in mind that certain clauses in the Will may overlap or conflict with one another. Because these clauses cannot be changed and the testator cannot be asked for an explanation, care must be taken to ensure that these clauses do not contradict one another.

n case the clause(s) are inconsistent and a divergent meaning is possible, the order of precedence should be followed, i.e., the more powerful/meaningful clause(s) is to take precedence over the less meaningful clause(s). When there is a clause bequeathing absolute rights then the same cannot be followed by other clause(s) with restricted rights. An absolute right is an outright recognition which cannot be fettered by imposing a condition in the form of a restrictive right,”

The Court Held

The bench ruled that when a clause’s words can be read in multiple ways, it is best to choose and interpret them in a way that is most likely to be plausible and constructive for everyone as a whole in order to draw a “single straight line” with no breaks rather than reverting to an interpretation that is implausibly destructive and works against everyone’s best interests.

It further stated that all words should be taken into consideration as essential and that all sentences should be reconciled with one another and read collectively as if they were all a part of the same document.

The bench explained that if doing the same thing is not practicable for some reason, the better interpretation should be used to bring an end to the conflicting circumstances.

The appeal, which contested the sole judge’s decision and preliminary decree based on Sheila Kapila’s will, which set aside a 25% equal portion for each of her children before selling it and dividing the revenues among them, was before the bench.

Conflict erupted because Sheila Kapila’s son passed away and left a Will leaving little for his two children and everything to his second. They submitted an appeal arguing that Sheila Kapila’s four children only received a limited bequest under her will but they, together with the rest of the testator’s grandchildren, received an absolute bequest.

The judges stated at the outset that,

A Will will be a Will only when it will lay to rest the wishes of who is at rest,” and that it will be their endeavour to proceed so that the “will of who lays at rest is put to rest”

Following consideration of the arguments, the court concluded that there is an absolute bequest in favour of the four children and that the phrases and language employed in the will are neither cryptic or ambiguous.

Finding no infirmity, perversity or illegality in the Impugned Judgment dated 10.05.2022 passed by the Learned Single Judge qua the interpretation of the Will in question, we find there are no grounds of interference by this Court.

As a result, the appeals were dismissed.

For the appellants, senior advocate Sudhanshu Batra was joined by advocates Gagan Mathur, Madhu Sehgal, and Rishi Sehgal.

Respondents were defended by Senior Advocates Ashish Dholakia and Arvind Nigam, as well as Advocates Jai Sahai Endlaw, Ashish Kumar, Niharika Ahluwalia, Ishita Deswal, Astha Badoriya, and Mansi Sharma.

[Read Judgment]

Vikrant Kapila & Anr v Pankaja Panda & Ors.pdf
Tags: delhi high courtInterpretation of WillJustice Saurabh BanerjeeJustice Suresh Kumar KaitTestatorWILL
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Sir P.V.R Reddy, IRS Rtd
APERC

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

May 6, 2025
News

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

May 26, 2024
Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp  is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court
News

Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court

February 13, 2024
Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.
News

Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.

February 13, 2024
The Supreme Court declines to stay the Madras High Court's ruling dismissing the challenge against Google Play's billing policy.
News

The Supreme Court declines to stay the Madras High Court’s ruling dismissing the challenge against Google Play’s billing policy.

February 12, 2024
election commission, supreme court news, Patna Court News, Clock Election symbol, NCP, Sharad Pawar, Ajit Pawar
News

Know More: Ajit Pawar Election symbol clock for NCP by the Election Commission

February 7, 2024
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
Know About Registration Of The Partition Document Is Compulsory?

Know About Registration Of The Partition Document Is Compulsory?

January 1, 2024
Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
multiple bar association enrollment

Can an Advocate Enroll for Multiple Bar Associations?

May 8, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations contempt of court defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act public interest litigation rajasthan high court Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india Union Law Ministry varanasi court

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

by S Sreedhar
May 6, 2025
0
Sir P.V.R Reddy, IRS Rtd
APERC

Precedent No. JB 2025 APERC OP 91 The APERC Headed by Hon'ble Sir P.V.R. Reddy, Member & Chairman (i/c) in...

Read more

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

by S Sreedhar
May 26, 2024
0
News

On Friday, the Supreme Court declined to issue an interim order on a petition from the NGO Association for Democratic...

Read more

Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court

by S Sreedhar
February 13, 2024
0
Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp  is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court
News

Is a legal notice sent through WhatsApp or email legal?

Read more

Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.

by S Sreedhar
February 13, 2024
0
Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.
News

National Company Law Tribunal,NCLT Mumbai,Dream 11

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

Latest Court News

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In