• About
  • Contcat Us
Monday, January 30, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Delhi High court iterated to initiated u/s 107 and not u/s 145 CrPC in the pretext of threat to breach of peace when the civil proceedings were pending

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
June 6, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
Delhi high court

Delhi high court

0
SHARES
15
VIEWS

The Delhi High Court Single Bench comprising Justice Asha Menon in the case of Murari Mirchandani vs State & Ors. observed that In the event of a threat to the peace, procedures would be launched u/s 107 and not u/s 145 CrPC once the civil proceedings were pending.

The petitioner, a real estate developer, claimed that the Delhi Development Authority (“DDA”) leased a property to late Sh. Surender Kumar Sardana, who died in 2011, leaving his siblings, Jitender Sardana (since deceased, respondent no. 3 herein), Sushma Diwan, Sushila Arora (since deceased), and Pushpa Mendiratta, as legal heirs. While the respondent No.3 petitioned the DDA to change the property’s ownership to the surviving legal heirs, the respondent No.2 filed a complaint, claiming to have purchased the property from Sh. Surender Kumar Sardana and possessing all original documents. The DDA informed respondent No. 3 that due to the complaint, no action could be taken.

The SDM could not have brought up the issue of de-sealing while civil proceedings were pending. Ram Sumer Puri Mahant v. State of U.P., Indubhai Patel v. State, Dalbir Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi), and Roop Lal Bhalla v. State were cited to argue that civil proceedings could not be started while civil proceedings were pending. It was also argued, based on Xxx v. State of Kerala, that courts are not empowered to recall their own judgments under Section 362 CrPC.

READ ALSO

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

Despite the fact that the civil case was still pending, no summons had been issued to respondent No.2 in that case. In addition, the Coordinate Bench of this Court had not issued an injunction against respondent No. 2, who was the defendant No. 5 in that suit. As a result, the respondent No.2 was well within his rights to ask the SDM to de-seal the property and hand it over to him, as he was legally entitled to it.

The Bench stated that if there is a dispute over a property’s title, only a civil court can resolve it. The SDM must follow the civil court’s determination of the parties’ inter se rights, whether interim or final. According to Dalbir Singh (supra), if there was a threat to breach of peace despite the civil case being pending and orders being issued by the civil court, then proceedings would be initiated u/s 107 and not u/s 145 CrPC.

The Court also stated that the Notice of 2021 was perverse on its face for two reasons. To begin with, the SDM has not observed an emerging ground of public disturbance, which could have justified the re-opening of the case, though, once again, the provision to be invoked in that event was u/s 107 CrPC. The SDM then made the second error by issuing the contested notice without producing any civil court order determining the rights, whether it was an interim or final order.

The SDM’s action was completely illegal and a perverse exercise of power, according to the Bench. As a result, the Notice was quashed in order to prevent abuse of the legal system.

Read Order

217-Murari-Mirchandani-vs-State-Ors.Download
Tags: Breach of Peacedelhi high courtJustice Asha Menonsec 107 crpcsection 145 crpc
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Bombay high court
News

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

January 11, 2023
The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts
News

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

January 11, 2023
Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.
News

Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.

January 11, 2023
judges appointment to Andhra Pradesh and Karanataka High court
News

Collegium proposes the appointment of two judicial officers as judges of the high courts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

January 11, 2023
The Uttarakhand High Court's order to the CBI to investigate former CM Trivendra Rawat was quashed by the Supreme Court.
News

The Uttarakhand High Court’s order to the CBI to investigate former CM Trivendra Rawat was quashed by the Supreme Court.

January 5, 2023
Madras-HC-uapa
News

Can the blind guide the blind? The Madras High Court orders the TN Judicial Academy to provide judges with UAPA and remand training.

December 30, 2022
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
jug jugg jeeyo

Copyright infringement | Jugjugg Jeeyo movie stay refused by Ranchi court

June 25, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements legal news madras high court murder Nawab Malik patna high court pil pocso act public interest litigation Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry Uttar Pradesh varanasi court

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
Bombay high court
News

Advocate Neela Gokhale was today recommended for promotion as judge of the Bombay High Court by the Supreme Court Collegium.

Read more

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts
News

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium proposed the nomination of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts.

Read more

Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.
News

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium decided to confirm the appointment of attorney Nagendra Ramachandra Naik as a Karnataka High...

Read more

Collegium proposes the appointment of two judicial officers as judges of the high courts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
judges appointment to Andhra Pradesh and Karanataka High court
News

Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended that two judicial officers be appointed as judges of the Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In