• About
  • Contcat Us
Monday, January 30, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Demolition in Prayagraj, Javed Mohammad’s wife received a notice that was back-dated and created with the admin’s help for the Allahabad High Court.

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
June 28, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
Demolition in Prayagraj

Demolition in Prayagraj

0
SHARES
3
VIEWS

The wife of activist Javed Mohammad, who is charged in the Prayagraj violence case, filed a petition in Parveen Fatima v. State of UP on Monday, but the case was supposed to be heard on Tuesday. She is challenging the Prayagraj Development Authority’s (PDA) decision to demolish their home earlier this month.

Parveen Fatima asserted ownership of the house that the authorities had torn down in her plea. She claimed that she had never received a warning before the demolition and that the notice had actually been sent in her husband’s name.

It was further argued that on the evening of June 11, when the house was shut due to her and her husband’s arrest and detention, the local police slapped the notice on the property’s front wall. Fatima has claimed that because Mohammad was not even the owner of the house, the authorities could not issue a notice of demolition in his name.

READ ALSO

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

The petition also provides information regarding the notice that the authorities sent out on June 10. It was claimed in this notice that on May 10 of this year, Mohammad received a notice from the authorities according to Section 27(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The hearing was scheduled for May 24, but according to the notice from the authorities, no one showed up. On May 25, the authorities allegedly issued a demolition order for the home, which was allegedly posted on it with the intention that Mohammed would personally demolish it by June 9.

Fatima, on the other hand, has argued that neither she nor her husband received any such notices.

“That it is relevant to mention that, no notices of 10.05.2022, 25.05.2022 and 10.06.2022 were ever served on the owner of the house, Parveen Fatima. These notices were also not served on Javed Mohammad or any other member of his family…It is submitted that notices dated 10.05.022, 25.05.2022 are manufactured documents,”

The Plea Stated

It was asserted that the June 10 notification was back-dated and created with the district administration’s cooperation to support the house’s demolition. The argument continues by claiming that the justification supplied by the authorities for the demolition was surprising since it violated both the Constitution and the rule of law. It was emphasised that a person’s home could not be demolished following a trial, much less on the basis of a mere allegation.

According to Fatima, she and her daughter, who is 19 years old, were detained around midnight, in violation of the Criminal Procedure Code’s (CrPC) rules and the Supreme Court’s ruling in DK Basu v. Union of India. Furthermore, the arrest was contested as being unlawful because no first information report (FIR) or warrant for their arrest had been issued.

On these grounds, the petitioner requested that government accommodations be made for her and her family, that her home be rebuilt, that she be compensated for the loss of her home and reputation, that she be released from her illegal detention, and that the officers in charge of the alleged illegal demolition face disciplinary action.

Advocates KK Roy, Rajvendra Singh, and Mohd Saeed Siddiqui are defending the petitioner.

After violence broke out in Prayagraj amid demonstrations against remarks made against Islam by BJP politician Nupur Sharma, Mohammad was brought into arrest on the evening of June 10. The police alleged that Muhammad started a fight in which several Muslim teenagers threw rocks at them. Additionally detained and released a day later were Mohammad’s wife Fatima and daughter Summaiya. The municipal authorities in Prayagraj destroyed their home while they were being held there on the grounds that it was an illegitimate building.

The current push to demolish the homes of people who allegedly took part in the protests is being contested in a petition filed by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind before the Supreme Court. The Uttar Pradesh administration was asked to respond to the case on June 16, but no interim respite was provided.

The local development authority, a separate entity from the State government, carried out the demolitions, the Uttar Pradesh administration justified last week.

In particular, the State argued that the construction of Javed Mohammad’s home was “in breach of Prayagraj Development Authority guidelines” and that proceedings were started far “before than the rioting” that broke out following the insult about the Prophet made by now-suspended BJP politician Nupur Sharma.

Tags: Allahabad High CourtJaved MohammadJustice Vikram D ChauhanJustices Sunita AgarwalPrayagraj DemolitionUttar Pradesh government
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Bombay high court
News

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

January 11, 2023
The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts
News

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

January 11, 2023
Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.
News

Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.

January 11, 2023
judges appointment to Andhra Pradesh and Karanataka High court
News

Collegium proposes the appointment of two judicial officers as judges of the high courts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

January 11, 2023
The Uttarakhand High Court's order to the CBI to investigate former CM Trivendra Rawat was quashed by the Supreme Court.
News

The Uttarakhand High Court’s order to the CBI to investigate former CM Trivendra Rawat was quashed by the Supreme Court.

January 5, 2023
Madras-HC-uapa
News

Can the blind guide the blind? The Madras High Court orders the TN Judicial Academy to provide judges with UAPA and remand training.

December 30, 2022
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
jug jugg jeeyo

Copyright infringement | Jugjugg Jeeyo movie stay refused by Ranchi court

June 25, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements legal news madras high court murder Nawab Malik patna high court pil pocso act public interest litigation Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry Uttar Pradesh varanasi court

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
Bombay high court
News

Advocate Neela Gokhale was today recommended for promotion as judge of the Bombay High Court by the Supreme Court Collegium.

Read more

The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts
News

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium proposed the nomination of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts.

Read more

Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Nagendra Ramachandra Naik’s appointment as a Karnataka High Court judge for the third time.
News

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium decided to confirm the appointment of attorney Nagendra Ramachandra Naik as a Karnataka High...

Read more

Collegium proposes the appointment of two judicial officers as judges of the high courts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.

by By Justuce Bench
January 11, 2023
0
judges appointment to Andhra Pradesh and Karanataka High court
News

Tuesday, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended that two judicial officers be appointed as judges of the Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • The Supreme Court Collegium recommends advocate Neela Gokhale as judge of the Bombay High Court

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Supreme Court Collegium recommends the appointment of judges to the Gauhati and Manipur High Courts

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In