• About
  • Contcat Us
Friday, May 9, 2025
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home News

Former judges write a letter to CJI NV Ramana to take suo motu cognizance over Uttar Pradesh demolitions – know more

S Sreedhar by S Sreedhar
June 14, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
Former judges write a letter to CJI NV Ramana to take suo motu cognizance over Uttar Pradesh demolitions - know more

Former judges write a letter to CJI NV Ramana to take suo motu cognizance over Uttar Pradesh demolitions - know more

0
SHARES
7
VIEWS

Former Supreme Court and High Court justices, as well as eminent lawyers, have written to Chief Justice of India (CJI) NV Ramana, urging the supreme court to take suo motu cognizance of the Uttar Pradesh State authorities’ demolition of protesters’ homes and arrest of many of them.

The letter, signed by 12 retired judges and senior attorneys, asks the Supreme Court to intervene to stop Uttar Pradesh’s “deteriorating law and order situation.”

The letter emphasised how recent statements about the Prophet Mohammed made by several BJP spokespersons (now suspended from office) have sparked protests across the country, notably in Uttar Pradesh.

READ ALSO

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

Instead of providing demonstrators a chance to be heard and engage in peaceful protests, the UP state administration appears to have sanctioned taking physical action against them, according to the letter. Officials have reportedly been urged by the Chief Minister to “take such punishment against those who are guilty that it sets an example so that no one commits a crime or takes justice into their own hands in the future.”

According to the letter, the Chief Minister’s comments have spurred police to mercilessly and criminally torture demonstrators.

According to the letter, the UP police have arrested over 300 people and filed FIRs against protesting residents as a result of this. On social media, videos of young men in police custody being beaten with lathis, protestors’ homes being razed without warning or cause, and protestors from the minority Muslim community being hunted and abused by the police are circulating, disturbing the nation’s conscience.

It was also claimed that such a harsh crackdown by a ruling government is an intolerable subversion of the rule of law and a violation of citizens’ rights, as well as a parody of the Constitution and the State’s fundamental rights.

According to the letter, the coordinated actions of the police and development authorities led to the clear conclusion that demolitions are a kind of collective extrajudicial punishment resulting from an unconstitutional state policy.

The judiciary’s mettle is put to the test in such situations, and it has previously risen to the occasion, according to the letter, citing how it took suo motu action in the migrant labourers case and also issued instructions in the Pegasus case.

The letter strongly suggested. We therefore urge the Hon’ble Supreme Court to take immediate suo motu action to arrest the deteriorating law and order situation in Uttar Pradesh, specifically involving the high-handedness of the police and state authorities, and the brutal clampdown on citizens’ fundamental rights, in the same spirit and in its role as custodian of the Constitution.

We hope and believe that the Supreme Court will rise to the occasion and not fail the public or the Constitution at this important point, the statement continued.

The following people have signed the letter:

1. Justice B. Sudarshan Reddy (Former judge of Supreme Court of India);

2. Justice V. Gopala Gowda (Former judge of Supreme Court of India);

3. Justice A.K. Ganguly, (Former judge of Supreme Court of India);

4. Justice AP Shah (Former Chief Justice of Delhi High Court and former Chairperson, Law Commission of India);

5. Justice K Chandru (Former Judge of Madras High Court);

6. Justice Mohammed Anwar (Former Judge of Karnataka High Court);

7. Shanti Bhushan (Senior Advocate, Supreme Court);

8. Indira Jaisingh (Senior Advocate, Supreme Court);

9. Chander Uday Singh (Senior Advocate, Supreme Court);

10. Sriram Panchu (Senior Advocate, Madras High Court);

11. Prashant Bhushan (Advocate, Supreme Court);

12. Anand Grover (Senior Advocate, Supreme Court).

Tags: Building DemolitioncjiJustice N.V.RamanaProphet Muhammadsupreme court of indiaUttar Pradesh
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Sir P.V.R Reddy, IRS Rtd
APERC

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

May 6, 2025
News

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

May 26, 2024
Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp  is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court
News

Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court

February 13, 2024
Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.
News

Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.

February 13, 2024
The Supreme Court declines to stay the Madras High Court's ruling dismissing the challenge against Google Play's billing policy.
News

The Supreme Court declines to stay the Madras High Court’s ruling dismissing the challenge against Google Play’s billing policy.

February 12, 2024
election commission, supreme court news, Patna Court News, Clock Election symbol, NCP, Sharad Pawar, Ajit Pawar
News

Know More: Ajit Pawar Election symbol clock for NCP by the Election Commission

February 7, 2024
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
Know About Registration Of The Partition Document Is Compulsory?

Know About Registration Of The Partition Document Is Compulsory?

January 1, 2024
Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
multiple bar association enrollment

Can an Advocate Enroll for Multiple Bar Associations?

May 8, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations contempt of court defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act public interest litigation rajasthan high court Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india Union Law Ministry varanasi court

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

by S Sreedhar
May 6, 2025
0
Sir P.V.R Reddy, IRS Rtd
APERC

Precedent No. JB 2025 APERC OP 91 The APERC Headed by Hon'ble Sir P.V.R. Reddy, Member & Chairman (i/c) in...

Read more

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

by S Sreedhar
May 26, 2024
0
News

On Friday, the Supreme Court declined to issue an interim order on a petition from the NGO Association for Democratic...

Read more

Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court

by S Sreedhar
February 13, 2024
0
Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp  is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court
News

Is a legal notice sent through WhatsApp or email legal?

Read more

Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.

by S Sreedhar
February 13, 2024
0
Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.
News

National Company Law Tribunal,NCLT Mumbai,Dream 11

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

Latest Court News

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In