• About
  • Contcat Us
Tuesday, November 28, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Courses
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Courses
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

[Gyanvapi Mosque] Plea to quash FIR Lucknow University professor refused – know more

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
May 22, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
[Gyanvapi Mosque] Plea to quash FIR Lucknow University professor refused - know more

[Gyanvapi Mosque] Plea to quash FIR Lucknow University professor refused - know more

0
SHARES
4
VIEWS

On Thursday, the Allahabad High Court comprising Bench of Justice Arvind Kumar Mishra and Manish Mathur in the case of Ravi Kant vs the State of UP refused to quash an FIR registered against a Lucknow University Professor Mr. Ravi Kant Chandan.

Mr Ravi Kant Chandan, a professor at Lucknow University, has been charged with making anti-Kashi Vishwanath Temple statements against Hindu saints during the ongoing Kashi Vishwanath Temple-Gyanvapi Temple dispute.

The Bench comprising Justice Arvind Kumar Mishra and Manish Mathur directed the police to comply with provisions of u.s 41(1)b r.w Section 41A CrPC if the professor is arrested.

READ ALSO

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

An FIR was filed against the professor on May 9 after he made comments during a debate on the Satya Hindu YouTube channel.

The professor was booked under sections 153A, 504, and 505(2) of the Indian Penal code and under section 166 of Information Technology.

Sec 153A IPC – punishes persons who indulge in wanton vilification or attacks upon the religion, race, place of birth, residence, language etc of any particular group or class or upon the founders and prophets of a religion

Sec 504 IPC – provocation to any person, intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace

Sec 505(2) IPC – Statements conducing to public mischief

During the debate, it is alleged that the professor made indecent statements about the temple and Hindu saints, causing hurt feelings among University students.

t was also alleged that when the university students confronted him he called goons from outside to beat up the students.

The professor filed a petition before the High Court, requesting that the FIR be quashed and that police do not arrest the accused in a mechanical manner.

As per the court, there is mere apprehension on part of the petitioner that he would be arrested and therefore the court directed the police if the accused is arrested then provisions u.s 41(1)(b r.w Section 41A of CrPC be followed.

Counsel for Petitioner

Nitin Kumar Mishra

Counsel for Respondent

G.A.

Case No.: Crl Misc. WP No.: 2910/2022

ravi-kant-v-state-of-up-thru-secy-deptt-home-govt-up-civil-sectt-lko-and-others-allahabad-hcDownload
Tags: 482crpcAllahabad High CourtFIRGyanvapi Mosquelucknow universityquashing fir
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Chhota Rajan Files Lawsuit in Bombay High Court Against Netflix Series 'Scoop,' Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights
News

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

June 1, 2023
Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction
News

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

June 1, 2023
The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.
News

The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.

April 24, 2023
calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

February 24, 2023
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

February 24, 2023
pocso act
News

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

February 23, 2023
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
multiple bar association enrollment

Can an Advocate Enroll for Multiple Bar Associations?

May 8, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court Central Bureau of Investigation central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate gauhati high court Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry varanasi court

important sections in contact while drafting contact

by By Justuce Bench
June 3, 2023
0
Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation
Articles

In contract law, there are several important sections that govern the rights, obligations, and enforcement of contracts. While the specific...

Read more

Eight types of contract laws

by By Justuce Bench
June 3, 2023
0
Eight types of contract laws
Articles

Contract law is the legal field responsible for governing and enforcing binding agreements. Contracts play a vital role in holding...

Read more

Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation

by By Justuce Bench
June 2, 2023
0
Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation
Articles

We frequently engage in numerous agreements in our daily lives, ranging from buying vegetables at the market to installing and...

Read more

An overview of the process of rescinding contracts

by By Justuce Bench
June 2, 2023
0
rescission of contact
Articles

The term "rescission" originates from the Latin word 'rescindere', meaning to cut or tear open. It refers to the act...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • important sections in contact while drafting contact

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Telangana High Court has ruled that notice under section 41A is required for offences punishable by up to seven years 

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • An overview of the process of rescinding contracts

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Can’t Invoke 340 CrPC for false Statement Which Doesn’t Affect the Outcome of Case

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Courses

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In