• About
  • Contcat Us
Friday, May 9, 2025
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home News

In a trademark lawsuit Karim’s v. Kareem’s, the Delhi High Court provides relief to an iconic Mughlai food business in Old Delhi

S Sreedhar by S Sreedhar
May 27, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
0
Karim's v. Kareem's

Karim's v. Kareem's

0
SHARES
61
VIEWS

The Delhi High court bench comprising single judge Justice Prathiba M Singh in the case of Karim Hotel Pvt. Ltd. vs. Kareem Dhanani noted that the trademark was registered by the Mumbai restaurant in 2003, about 90 years after the plaintiff had adopted the same.

The Delhi High Court on Friday granted interim relief to Old Delhi’s iconic Karim’s restaurant by ordering a Bombay-based restaurant, ‘Kareem’s,’ to post a disclaimer on their website, social media handles, and in the newspaper stating categorically that it is not related to or associated with the Delhi Karim’s.

Justice Prathiba M Singh, a single-judge, also ordered ‘Kareem’s’ to stop opening new stores until the case’s next hearing date.

READ ALSO

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

The Court found that the defendant restaurant Kareem’s had adopted the trademark in 2003, over 90 years after the plaintiff had adopted the same.

“The plaintiff is the primary owner of the mark, Karim’s, running over 41 restaurants. However, in this case a balance must be struck to ensure that neither party is prejudiced unfairly. The plaintiff’s mark enjoys enormous goodwill and and reputation, both in India and internationally.”

The Court said

Surprisingly, the Court was perplexed as to how the Registrar allowed the defendants to register this mark while Karim’s was already in use.

Following that, the Court ordered the defendants to file written declarations as well as a list of franchise agreements with all of its franchisees by July 5, 2022.

In the first week of August, the case will be heard.

Advocate Farrukh Khan, appearing on behalf of Karim’s, said that the plaintiffs are the owners of a well-known trademark with great goodwill and recognition both domestically and globally.

He also claimed that using the registered trademark would result in deceit and passing off.

Khan further stated that this was the parties’ second round of litigation, as the first complaint was dismissed due to the dismantlement of the Chennai-based Intellectual Property Appellate Board.

Defendant Kareem Dhanani, on the other hand, claimed that his trademark was also registered in 2003 and that he chose the term Kareem’s after his own name.

“I am also a chef. My name is also Kareem,” 

Khan added
Tags: delhi high courtIPRkarimspassing offtrademark
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Sir P.V.R Reddy, IRS Rtd
APERC

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

May 6, 2025
News

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

May 26, 2024
Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp  is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court
News

Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court

February 13, 2024
Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.
News

Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.

February 13, 2024
The Supreme Court declines to stay the Madras High Court's ruling dismissing the challenge against Google Play's billing policy.
News

The Supreme Court declines to stay the Madras High Court’s ruling dismissing the challenge against Google Play’s billing policy.

February 12, 2024
election commission, supreme court news, Patna Court News, Clock Election symbol, NCP, Sharad Pawar, Ajit Pawar
News

Know More: Ajit Pawar Election symbol clock for NCP by the Election Commission

February 7, 2024
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
Know About Registration Of The Partition Document Is Compulsory?

Know About Registration Of The Partition Document Is Compulsory?

January 1, 2024
Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
multiple bar association enrollment

Can an Advocate Enroll for Multiple Bar Associations?

May 8, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations contempt of court defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act public interest litigation rajasthan high court Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india Union Law Ministry varanasi court

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

by S Sreedhar
May 6, 2025
0
Sir P.V.R Reddy, IRS Rtd
APERC

Precedent No. JB 2025 APERC OP 91 The APERC Headed by Hon'ble Sir P.V.R. Reddy, Member & Chairman (i/c) in...

Read more

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

by S Sreedhar
May 26, 2024
0
News

On Friday, the Supreme Court declined to issue an interim order on a petition from the NGO Association for Democratic...

Read more

Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court

by S Sreedhar
February 13, 2024
0
Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp  is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court
News

Is a legal notice sent through WhatsApp or email legal?

Read more

Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.

by S Sreedhar
February 13, 2024
0
Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.
News

National Company Law Tribunal,NCLT Mumbai,Dream 11

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

Latest Court News

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In