• About
  • Contcat Us
Friday, May 9, 2025
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home News

MediaOne Ban | When national security is at stake, there is no obligation to reveal the reasons for refusing security clearance, MHA to the Supreme Court.

S Sreedhar by S Sreedhar
June 1, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
media one ban supreme court

media one ban supreme court

0
SHARES
15
VIEWS

The Supreme Court in the case of Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd. v Union of India heard the central government statement that denial of the security clearance to MediaOne channel was based on “intelligence inputs“

The Supreme Court has been told by the Central Government that the denial of security clearance to Malayalam news channel MediaOne was based on intelligence inputs, and that the Union Home Ministry is under no responsibility to divulge the reasons for such denials in matters involving national security.

The Central government maintained in an affidavit submitted before the Supreme Court that the MHA does not divulge the reasons for rejection of such clearance as a matter of policy and in the interest of the State and its enterprises.

READ ALSO

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

“It is submitted that in cases like the present wherein the matter concerning national security is involved, the petitioner company cannot insist upon strict compliance with principles of natural justice and the respondent is not bound to disclose the reasons for denial of security clearance to the petitioner-company,” 

Stated The Central Government

It was also said that the reasons for denial had already been presented to the High Court and Supreme Court, and that if it is requested to do so again, the report will be delivered “under a sealed cover.”

“MHA under Section 124 of the Indian Evidence Act seeks privilege over its secret files and prays that the contents of the files may not be disclosed to the petitioner since such disclosure may have far reaching and unimaginable consequences in so far as national security is concerned,”

The Central Government stated

On March 13, a bench of Justices DY Chandrachud, Surya Kant, and Vikram Nath directed that the channel be allowed to begin operations in the same manner as before the security clearance was revoked.

MediaOne’s petition to the Supreme Court challenges a Kerala High Court Division Bench decision that sustained the Central government’s prohibition.

Chief Justice S Manikumar and Justice Shaji P Chaly of the Division Bench upheld a single-judge verdict rejecting the channel’s appeal against the government’s decision to cancel its licence.

The decision of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (I&B Ministry) to withdraw the Malayalam channel’s licence was affirmed by single-judge Justice N Nagaresh on February 8. The material given over to the Court in a sealed cover suggested that the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) had adequate reason to refuse the channel security clearance, therefore justifying the ban, according to the Court.

The appeal before the Division Bench claimed that the Central government’s hurry to revoke the station’s licence indicated that there was a pre-planned agenda motivated by animosity toward the channel.

The ministry issued a notice to the channel, which is owned by Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited, on January 5, 2022, stating that the government can remove licences in the interest of national security and public order. It further demanded that they demonstrate cause why their licence should not be cancelled because the company had not been granted security clearance by the Ministry of Home Affairs.

The decision to revoke the licence was based on legitimate national security concerns, according to the Central government.

They refused to say what MHA’s concerns were, arguing that in a situation involving national security, a party cannot insist on following natural justice principles.

Tags: kerala high courtMediaone bansupreme court of india
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Sir P.V.R Reddy, IRS Rtd
APERC

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

May 6, 2025
News

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

May 26, 2024
Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp  is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court
News

Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court

February 13, 2024
Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.
News

Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.

February 13, 2024
The Supreme Court declines to stay the Madras High Court's ruling dismissing the challenge against Google Play's billing policy.
News

The Supreme Court declines to stay the Madras High Court’s ruling dismissing the challenge against Google Play’s billing policy.

February 12, 2024
election commission, supreme court news, Patna Court News, Clock Election symbol, NCP, Sharad Pawar, Ajit Pawar
News

Know More: Ajit Pawar Election symbol clock for NCP by the Election Commission

February 7, 2024
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
Know About Registration Of The Partition Document Is Compulsory?

Know About Registration Of The Partition Document Is Compulsory?

January 1, 2024
Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
multiple bar association enrollment

Can an Advocate Enroll for Multiple Bar Associations?

May 8, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations contempt of court defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act public interest litigation rajasthan high court Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india Union Law Ministry varanasi court

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

by S Sreedhar
May 6, 2025
0
Sir P.V.R Reddy, IRS Rtd
APERC

Precedent No. JB 2025 APERC OP 91 The APERC Headed by Hon'ble Sir P.V.R. Reddy, Member & Chairman (i/c) in...

Read more

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

by S Sreedhar
May 26, 2024
0
News

On Friday, the Supreme Court declined to issue an interim order on a petition from the NGO Association for Democratic...

Read more

Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court

by S Sreedhar
February 13, 2024
0
Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp  is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court
News

Is a legal notice sent through WhatsApp or email legal?

Read more

Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.

by S Sreedhar
February 13, 2024
0
Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.
News

National Company Law Tribunal,NCLT Mumbai,Dream 11

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

Latest Court News

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In