• About
  • Contcat Us
Wednesday, October 4, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Supreme Court refused to stay the ongoing delimitation process in Jammu and Kashmir | Kashmir has always been a part of the country

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
May 14, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
0
Supreme Court refused to stay the ongoing delimitation process in Jammu and Kashmir

Supreme Court refused to stay the ongoing delimitation process in Jammu and Kashmir

0
SHARES
5
VIEWS

The Supreme Court of India on Friday refused to stay the ongoing delimitation process in Jammu and Kashmir. The court asked the Senior Advocate Ravi Shankar Jandhyala the petitioner’s counsel, to be mindful of his language in Court. 

The bench asked the counsel if he had raised any issues regarding Article 370 in the current petition, which has essentially challenged the Delimitation exercise undertaken in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir in accordance with the notifications of 2020, 2021, and 2022. 

The bench while hearing the present case, which also comprises Justice MM Sundresh, questioned the petitioner’s counsel Senior Advocate Ravi Shankar Jandhyala on whether the petition is challenging the repeal of Article 370 of the Constitution.

READ ALSO

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

Accordingly, the petitioner Counsel Replied that On August 5, 2019, Kashmir became a part of the country….

In Reply Justice Kaul said: 

Be mindful of the language you use. Kashmir has always been a part of the country! Just a special provision was removed

The Court also questioned Jandhyala on why he had not challenged the two-year-old delimitation constitution. 

The counsel responded by stating that delimitation is a process that should only be undertaken by the election commission and not by any other body. 

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the Court that the first prayer in the petition was for the delimitation to be conducted by the committee rather than the election commission, and the second prayer was for the census. 

After hearing the parties, the court directed the central government and the election commission to file their replies in the matter and also directed that averments regarding the repeal of Article 370 be ignored. 

The bench declined to issue a notice in the case. 

The hearing has now been rescheduled for August 30, 2022.

Tags: delimitation of jamu and kashmirKashmir intergal part of indiasupreme court
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Chhota Rajan Files Lawsuit in Bombay High Court Against Netflix Series 'Scoop,' Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights
News

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

June 1, 2023
Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction
News

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

June 1, 2023
The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.
News

The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.

April 24, 2023
calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

February 24, 2023
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

February 24, 2023
pocso act
News

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

February 23, 2023
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
Right to Promotion is a Fundamental Right Not the Right to Promotion

Right to Consider to Promotion is a Fundamental Right But Not the Right to Promotion

May 13, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court Central Bureau of Investigation central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate gauhati high court Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry varanasi court

important sections in contact while drafting contact

by By Justuce Bench
June 3, 2023
0
Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation
Articles

In contract law, there are several important sections that govern the rights, obligations, and enforcement of contracts. While the specific...

Read more

Eight types of contract laws

by By Justuce Bench
June 3, 2023
0
Eight types of contract laws
Articles

Contract law is the legal field responsible for governing and enforcing binding agreements. Contracts play a vital role in holding...

Read more

Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation

by By Justuce Bench
June 2, 2023
0
Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation
Articles

We frequently engage in numerous agreements in our daily lives, ranging from buying vegetables at the market to installing and...

Read more

An overview of the process of rescinding contracts

by By Justuce Bench
June 2, 2023
0
rescission of contact
Articles

The term "rescission" originates from the Latin word 'rescindere', meaning to cut or tear open. It refers to the act...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • important sections in contact while drafting contact

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Telangana High Court has ruled that notice under section 41A is required for offences punishable by up to seven years 

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In