• About
  • Contcat Us
Wednesday, December 6, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Courses
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Courses
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Supreme Court | Sex workers should not be verbally or physically abused by police officers; they should be treated with dignity

S Sreedhar by S Sreedhar
May 26, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 6 mins read
0
0
Supreme Court | Sex workers should not be verbally or physically abused by police officers; they should be treated with dignity

Supreme Court | Sex workers should not be verbally or physically abused by police officers; they should be treated with dignity

0
SHARES
6
VIEWS

The Supreme Court of India in Budhadev Karmaskar vs. State of West Bengal and ors case directed, When reporting on raid/rescue operations, the Press Council of India is urging journalists to exercise extreme caution and not expose the identity of sex workers.

The Supreme Court reaffirmed last week that sex workers are entitled to all basic human rights and other constitutional rights, and that police officers should not verbally or physically assault people involved in sex work.

According to the Court, all sex workers should be treated with dignity, and law enforcement officials should be made aware of this.

READ ALSO

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

“The police and other law enforcement agencies should be sensitised to the rights of sex workers who also enjoy all basic human rights and other rights guaranteed in the Constitution to all citizens. Police should treat all sex workers with dignity and should not abuse them, both verbally and physically, subject them to violence or coerce them into any sexual activity,”

The Court Ordered

In particular, the Court ordered that, in accordance with Section 357C of the Code of Criminal Procedure, any sex worker who is a victim of sexual assault be given with all services accessible to a survivor of sexual assault, including prompt medical care (CrPC).

The Court further ordered the Press Council of India to urge the media to exercise extreme caution in not revealing the identity of sex workers or engaging in voyeurism during arrest/raid/rescue operations, as well as not publishing or broadcasting their photographs, particularly on television.

In a case involving the rehabilitation and rights of sex workers, a bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao, BR Gavai, and AS Bopanna issued the order.

The decision was issued in response to recommendations made by a commission appointed by the Supreme Court in 2011 to investigate the working circumstances of sex workers and ensure that they can live in dignity.

In its report to the Court, the panel issued ten suggestions regarding the dignity of sex workers in accordance with Article 21 of the Constitution.

The central government also expressed reservations about some of the recommendations.

The Court stated in its order dated May 19 that all states and union territories must rigorously adhere to the following recommendations, which the Centre agreed to.

  • Any sex worker who is a victim of sexual assault should be provided with all facilities available to a survivor of sexual assault, including immediate medical assistance, in accordance with Section 357C of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with “Guidelines and Protocols: Medico-legal care for survivor/victims of sexual violence”, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (March, 2014).
  • The State Governments may be directed to do a survey of all ITPA Protective Homes so that cases of adult women, who are detained against their will can be reviewed and processed for release in a time-bound manner.
  • It has been noticed that the attitude of the police to sex workers is often brutal and violent. It is as if they are a class whose rights are not recognised. The police and other law enforcement agencies should be sensitised to the rights of sex workers who also enjoy all basic human rights and other rights guaranteed in the Constitution to all citizens. Police should treat all sex workers with dignity and should not abuse them, both verbally and physically, subject them to violence or coerce them into any sexual activity.
  • The Press Council of India should be urged to issue appropriate guidelines for the media to take utmost care not to reveal the identities of sex workers, during arrest, raid and rescue operations, whether as victims or accused and not to publish or telecast any photos that would result in disclosure of such identities. Besides, the newly introduced Section 354C, IPC which makes voyeurism a criminal offence, should be strictly enforced against electronic media, in order to prohibit telecasting photos of sex workers with their clients in the garb of capturing the rescue operation;
  • Measures that sex workers employ for their health and safety (e.g., use of condoms, 12 etc.)must neither be construed as offences nor seen as evidence of commission of an offence;
  • The Central Government and the State Governments, through National Legal Services Authority, State Legal Services Authority and District Legal Services Authority, should carry out workshops for educating the sex workers abut their rights vis-a-vis the legality of sex work, rights and obligations of the police and what is permitted/prohibited under the law. Sex workers can also be informed as to how they can get access to the judicial system to enforce their rights and prevent unnecessary harassment at the hands of traffickers or police.

These recommendations must be followed until the parliament passes legislation in this regard.

“As the legislation has not been made till date even though the recommendations were made by the Panel in the year 2016 and the said recommendations have to be implemented, we are exercising our powers conferred under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, to issue the directions which will hold the field till a legislation is made by the Union of India,“.

the Court stated

The following recommendations have been met with reservations by the central government:

  • Sex workers are entitled to equal protection of the law. Criminal law must apply equally in all cases, on the basis of ‘age’ and ‘consent’. When it is clear that the sex worker is an adult and is participating with consent, the police must refrain from interfering or taking any criminal action. There have been concerns that police view sex workers differently from others. When a sex worker makes a complaint of criminal/sexual/any other type of offence, the police must take it seriously and act in accordance with law.
  • Whenever there is a raid on any brothel, since voluntary sex work is not illegal and only running the brothel is unlawful, the sex workers concerned should not be arrested or penalised or harassed or victimised.
  • The Central Government and the State Governments must involve the sex workers and/or their representatives in all decision-making processes, including planning, designing and implementing any policy or programme for the sex workers or formulating any change/reform in the laws relating to sex work. This can be done, either by including them in the decision-making authorities/panel and/or by taking their views on any decision affecting them.
  • As already recommended in the 6th interim report dated March 22, 2012, no child of a sex worker should be separated from the mother merely on the ground that she is in the sex trade. Further, if a minor is found living in a brothel or with sex workers, it should not be presumed that he/she has been trafficked. In case the sex worker claims that he/she is her son/daughter, tests can be done to determine if the claim is correct and if so, the minor should not be forcibly separated.

The Court has requested the federal government to respond to the other recommendations, and will have additional hearings on the matter following the summer recess.

Furthermore, the Unique Identification Authority of India was told to grant Aadhaar to sex workers based on proforma certificates issued as per the list submitted by the National Aids Control Organization, in accordance with previous orders in the case.

“There should be no breach of confidentiality in the process, including assignment of any code in the Aadhar enrolment numbers that identity the applicant/holder of the card as a sex worker,” 

The Court Said

The Supreme Court had ordered all states and union territories to ensure the provision of a minimum quantity of dry ration to sex workers identified by the National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) and the District Legal Services Authority in an order issued in October 2020. (DLSA). This decree was passed because it was determined that sex workers would have difficulty producing any form of identification.

Since then, it has scheduled hearings to keep up with the latest developments in the case, chastising states for failing to follow its ruling.

Read Order

Budhadev_Karmaskar_vs__State_of_West_BengalDownload
Tags: dignitysex workerssupreme courtwelfare
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Chhota Rajan Files Lawsuit in Bombay High Court Against Netflix Series 'Scoop,' Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights
News

Chhota Rajan Files suit in Bombay HC Against Netflix Series Scoop Demands ₹1 as Damages for Violation of Personality Rights

June 1, 2023
Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction
News

Kerala High Court Upholds Right of Accused to Surrender, Rejects Refusal of Permission by Courts with Appropriate Jurisdiction

June 1, 2023
The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.
News

The Telangana High Court’s judgment restricting CBI’s questioning of YS Avinash Reddy is overturned by the Supreme Court.

April 24, 2023
calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

February 24, 2023
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

February 24, 2023
pocso act
News

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

February 23, 2023
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
multiple bar association enrollment

Can an Advocate Enroll for Multiple Bar Associations?

May 8, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court Central Bureau of Investigation central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate gauhati high court Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry varanasi court

Top Career Options for Advocates in India in 2024

by S Sreedhar
December 5, 2023
0
advocate carrier options
Articles

Choosing the right career path in the legal field can be a daunting decision, given various factors to consider. This...

Read more

procedure to get anticipatory bail in the 498a case.

by S Sreedhar
December 3, 2023
0
procedure to get anticipatory bail in the 498a case.
Articles

What is the procedure to get anticipatory bail in the 498a case?ORHow to get anticipatory bail in the 498a case?...

Read more

How to file for mutual consent divorce in India

by S Sreedhar
December 1, 2023
0
Mutual Consent Divorce
Articles

Divorce is a legal procedure that marks the termination of a marital union between two adults

Read more

important sections in contact while drafting contact

by S Sreedhar
June 3, 2023
0
Analysis of Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-Firm Cooperation
Articles

In contract law, there are several important sections that govern the rights, obligations, and enforcement of contracts. While the specific...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • Top Career Options for Advocates in India in 2024

Popular News

  • La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

    La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • procedure to get anticipatory bail in the 498a case.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Sachin S Former Assistant General Counsel at Flipkart joins RazorPay as Director Legal – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Top Career Options for Advocates in India in 2024

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Courses

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In