• About
  • Contcat Us
Monday, March 20, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Court Awards Death Sentence to Munir and Raiyan in NIA officer Tanzeel Murder Case

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
May 22, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
Court Awards Death Sentence to Munir and Raiyan in NIA officer Tanzeel Murder Case

Court Awards Death Sentence to Munir and Raiyan in NIA officer Tanzeel Murder Case

0
SHARES
2
VIEWS

On 20th May 2022 in the case of Tanzeel Khan vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others, (2013), Judge Dr. Vijay Kumar Talian of ADJ Gangster Court 5 sentenced to death to the main accused in the murder of NIA Deputy SP Tanjeel in Bijnor district, Munir and Raiyan, after the court found both accused guilty.

Subsequently, the court acquitted the other accused, TanzeemJenny, and Rizwan, during the hearing of this case. Munir and Raiyan, the main accused, murdered NIA officer Tanzeel and his wife Farzana on April 2, 2016.

The ADJ Gangster Court judge Dr. Vijay Kumar previously sentenced gangster Munir to ten years in prison and a fine of one lakh rupees for instilling fear in Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, and other states by committing serious crimes such as murder and robbery. Raiyan, Munir’s accomplice, was also sentenced to five years in prison and a Rs 50,000 fine.

READ ALSO

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

On Friday the court convicted both of the accused in the murder of the NIA officer and his wife. The court decided to announce the sentences for both of the defendants in the case and were sentenced to death in court today.

As per reports, Only people involved in the case were allowed inside the court after police conducted a check in the morning, It was stated that let us remind you that the police have been tight-lipped about the sentencing since the morning. The police were on high alert even inside the court.

Munir and his associates murdered NIA Deputy Superintendent Tanzeel Ahmed and his wife Farzana, The accused had a history of making money by committing heinous crimes such as murder, robbery, and dacoity in the district of Bijnor and other states. Simultaneously, Rs 95 lakh was stolen from a Punjab National Bank cash van in Dhampur.

Munir is the subject of 35 criminal charges.

The police have reported that 35 cases have been filed against Munir. Other states have filed charges against Munir, including Bijnor, Delhi, and Aligarh. Munir has 13 murders, robberies, and other crimes registered in the Bijnor district alone.

The killers shot Tanzeel Ahmed, the National Investigation Agency’s Deputy Special Prosecutor. To enter and exit the building, Tanzeel Ahmed received 33 bullet wounds, while his wife received six. The massacre was carried out with the most advanced weapons available. Deputy SP’s son Shahbaz and daughter Jimnish saved their lives by entering under the seat. The entire massacre took less than two minutes to complete.

Around one o’clock at night, Tanzeel Ahmed and his brother Ragib emerged from the banquet hall in their automobiles, and Munir and Rayyan parked their bikes behind Tanzeel’s car. Munir then opened fire on Tanzeel Ahmed, the car’s driver, as soon as he had the chance.

After firing from the pistol, Raiyan snatched the revolver and shot bullets. They both raced towards Sahaspur as they noticed Ragib’s automobile approaching from behind. Munir snatched his bike and backpack from Jaini and departed alone in the middle of the night, according to Rayyan. They went back to their different houses after that.

Tanzil had previously misbehaved with Rayyan’s uncle, but according to Rayyan, no action was taken against him. As a result, vengeance consumed him, and he sought to extract vengeance on Tanjil. The accused in this case was sentenced to death in court.

Tanzeel’s wife, Farzana Khatoon, worked as a government teacher at Government Girls Senior Secondary School in Batla House, Jamia Nagar, Delhi. Jimnish, Jimnish’s 16-year-old daughter, was a student at the time at Srinivaspuri’s Cambridge School. At the time, he was delivering his eighth paper. The son, Shahbaz, was 12 years old and in seventh grade.

Tags: convictionmurdernia officerTanzeel KhanTanzeel Khan vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

February 24, 2023
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

February 24, 2023
pocso act
News

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

February 23, 2023
The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.
News

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.

February 13, 2023
Justice Hima Kohli stated that Artificial Intelligence cannot replace the role of a judge or a lawyer, but it can handle cases such as traffic violations and cheque bounces.
News

Justice Hima Kohli stated that Artificial Intelligence cannot replace the role of a judge or a lawyer, but it can handle cases such as traffic violations and cheque bounces.

February 13, 2023
Central Government notifies appointment of Justice Sonia G Gokani as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court
News

The appointment of Justice Sonia G. Gokani as the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court has been announced by the central government.

February 13, 2023
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
jug jugg jeeyo

Copyright infringement | Jugjugg Jeeyo movie stay refused by Ranchi court

June 25, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate gauhati high court Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry Uttar Pradesh varanasi court

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

by By Justuce Bench
February 24, 2023
0
calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court in India recently refused to quash a criminal case involving charges under Section 377 and allegations...

Read more

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

by By Justuce Bench
February 24, 2023
0
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

The Bengaluru court issued a temporary injunction against IPS officer D Roopa Moudgil and 59 media companies from broadcasting defamatory...

Read more

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

by By Justuce Bench
February 23, 2023
0
pocso act
News

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal against a Kerala High Court decision which had ruled that poking one's...

Read more

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.

by By Justuce Bench
February 13, 2023
0
The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.
News

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a petition filed by Shweta Bhatt, wife of former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt who...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Allahabad HC rules Daughter has the right to demand maintenance from father

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • [Gyanvapi Mosque] Plea to quash FIR Lucknow University professor refused – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • On custody of a surrogate child born before Surrogacy Act of 2021 the Allahabad High Court has sought a response from Centre

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In