• About
  • Contcat Us
Monday, March 20, 2023
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
Home News

The Bombay High Court requests the Attorney General’s and Advocate General’s opinions on the challenge to the GST Rules amendment.

By Justuce Bench by By Justuce Bench
September 6, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
The Bombay High Court requests the Attorney General's and Advocate General's opinions on the challenge to the GST Rules amendment.

The Bombay High Court requests the Attorney General's and Advocate General's opinions on the challenge to the GST Rules amendment.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS

In a case involving a petition contesting an amendment to the Goods and Services Tax Rules of 2017 (GST Rules) that denies the assessee the right to be heard before suspending the GST registration, the Bombay High Court recently in the case of SAT Industries Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors served notice to the Attorney General for India and Advocate General of Maharashtra.

Justices KR Shriram and AS Doctor’s bench noted that the petition had contested changes to the Maharashtra GST and Central GST rules. Notice was sent to both Attorney General KK Venugopal and Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni in light of this.

SAT Industries Ltd., the petitioner, approached the High Court after receiving a show-cause notice for registration cancellation.

READ ALSO

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

“Please note that your registration stands suspended with effect from 08/08/2022”, the notification purportedly read.

The petitioner argued that the order contained in the show cause notice had been made without giving him or her a chance to be heard.

In order to challenge the constitutional legitimacy of the deletion of the phrase “after affording the said person a reasonable opportunity of being heard” from sub-rule 2 of Rule 21A of the Central GST Rules 2017, the petitioner went to court.

In accordance with Rule 21A, if there are discrepancies or irregularities between the GSTs, the proper tax officer may cancel a party’s registration. The officer has the authority to suspend the registration until the discrepancies can be clarified.

However, the clause requiring a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard before suspending the registration was removed by way of a notification dated December 12, 2020.

Now, Rule 2’s Sub-rule reads: Where the proper officer has reasons to believe that the registration of a person is liable to be cancelled under section 29 or under rule 21, he may,[ after affording the said person a reasonable opportunity of being heard,] suspend the registration of such person with effect from a date to be determined by him, pending the completion of the proceedings for cancellation of registration under rule 22”.

According to the argument made in the petition submitted through Nikhil Rungta, Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution’s fundamental rights were blatantly violated by not first hearing the petitioner before suspending the licence.

The removal of the phrase, according to senior advocate Vineet Kothari and attorney Mehul Kothari, violated the norms of natural justice because the implications of such a suspension are severe.

“A registered person whose registration has been suspended cannot make any taxable supply during the period of suspension and shall not be granted any refund during the period of suspension,”

It was submitted

Jyoti Chavan for State, a second government pleader, accepted the notice on behalf of the Advocate General. The government was instructed to submit its reply within two weeks, and the plea was scheduled for hearing on October 10.

The Bench granted the petitioner ad-interim relief and delayed the effects and application of the show-cause notice that suspended the petitioner’s registration certificate under the GST Act.

Due to this, the registration was momentarily reinstated while the case was heard.

[Read order]

SAT Industries Limited v. Union of India & Anr..pdf
Tags: Advocate General MaharashtraAshutosh KumbhakoniAttorney General KK VenugopalBombay high courtCGST RulesGoods and Services Tax
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

February 24, 2023
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

February 24, 2023
pocso act
News

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

February 23, 2023
The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.
News

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.

February 13, 2023
Justice Hima Kohli stated that Artificial Intelligence cannot replace the role of a judge or a lawyer, but it can handle cases such as traffic violations and cheque bounces.
News

Justice Hima Kohli stated that Artificial Intelligence cannot replace the role of a judge or a lawyer, but it can handle cases such as traffic violations and cheque bounces.

February 13, 2023
Central Government notifies appointment of Justice Sonia G Gokani as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court
News

The appointment of Justice Sonia G. Gokani as the Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court has been announced by the central government.

February 13, 2023
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

Why does Sequoia Capital terminate connections with Sandeep Kapoors Algo Legal? threats of ED searches, arm-twisting, and more

June 6, 2022
jug jugg jeeyo

Copyright infringement | Jugjugg Jeeyo movie stay refused by Ranchi court

June 25, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate gauhati high court Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india UAPA Union Law Ministry Uttar Pradesh varanasi court

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

by By Justuce Bench
February 24, 2023
0
calcutta hc
News

The Calcutta High Court in India recently refused to quash a criminal case involving charges under Section 377 and allegations...

Read more

Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

by By Justuce Bench
February 24, 2023
0
Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media
News

The Bengaluru court issued a temporary injunction against IPS officer D Roopa Moudgil and 59 media companies from broadcasting defamatory...

Read more

SC – Touching a finger to a vagina does not constitute “insertion” for the purposes of attracting charges of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act.

by By Justuce Bench
February 23, 2023
0
pocso act
News

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal against a Kerala High Court decision which had ruled that poking one's...

Read more

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.

by By Justuce Bench
February 13, 2023
0
The Gujarat High Court has rejected a request by the wife of Sanjiv Bhatt, stating that police protection is not a guaranteed right.
News

The Gujarat High Court has rejected a petition filed by Shweta Bhatt, wife of former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt who...

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

google news
google news

Recent Posts

  • The Calcutta High Court has ruled that any form of penetration, even if it is minimal, during forced anal sex is considered an offense under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

Popular News

  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Allahabad HC rules Daughter has the right to demand maintenance from father

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • [Gyanvapi Mosque] Plea to quash FIR Lucknow University professor refused – know more

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Bengaluru court has banned the spread of defamatory content about IAS officer Rohini Sindhuri in a lawsuit against Roopa Moudgil and the media

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • On custody of a surrogate child born before Surrogacy Act of 2021 the Allahabad High Court has sought a response from Centre

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Online Internship
  • Forums

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In