• About
  • Contcat Us
Saturday, June 7, 2025
Justice Bench
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
justice bench
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home News

The Delhi High Court chastises authorities for taking 35 years to decide on a farmer’s application, calling bureaucracy’s “Babudom” a symbol of the colonial mentality.

S Sreedhar by S Sreedhar
September 13, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
0
The Delhi High Court chastises authorities for taking 35 years to decide on a farmer's application, calling bureaucracy's "Babudom" a symbol of the colonial mentality.

The Delhi High Court chastises authorities for taking 35 years to decide on a farmer's application, calling bureaucracy's "Babudom" a symbol of the colonial mentality.

0
SHARES
2
VIEWS

The Delhi High Court in the case of Shri Ishwar Singh v Land and Building Department and Anr on Monday criticised the “Babu” culture in the Indian bureaucracy, calling it a sign of colonial mindset and a significant barrier to the country’s goal of becoming a developed country, while hearing a farmer’s appeal that had been pending before land authorities for more than 35 years.

It’s high time, according to single-judge Justice Chandra Dhari Singh, that the mindset is banished forever and the people of this nation are freed from such cancerous inclinations and colonial remnants.

Ishwar Singh, a farmer, filed a petition with the High Court claiming that the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) had purchased his land in Maidangarhi in 1987. Although he got compensation, the court was informed that his application for allotment of a substitute parcel of land is still pending.

READ ALSO

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

According to Justice Singh, in its decision dated August 2, 2022, the authorities were given explicit instructions to resolve Singh’s pending application within 15 days of the order’s date, failing which the concerned respondents’ officials had to appear in person before the court.

The judge stated that despite such obvious instructions, the government and its representatives have disobeyed the court’s orders, made no attempts to decide the application, and have not submitted any requests for a deadline extension or an exemption from personal appearance.

This clearly depicts the high-headedness of the officials namely – Vice-Chairman, DDA and Secretary, Land & Building Department

The Court Held

It went on to say that it is alarming that such a stance taken by the concerned officers and their “failure to fulfil their job” has resulted in the filing of numerous petitions before the High Courts across the nation, increasing the backlog and pendency of cases and burdening the judiciary.

According to the court, this amounts to a gross, wilful, and open breach of the court’s authority and is therefore prima facie evidence of contempt of court.

“It was regretfully remarked by this Court even in its last order that the situation depicted a sad state of affairs and travesty of justice that the representations of the citizens of this country have been reduced to mere pieces of paper and the system kept on moving, in its usual snail speed, being least bothered about their grievances. Consequently, their applications have been remaining stacked in files for decades and decades.

The orders passed by a constitutional Court of this country being violated at the sweet will of the officials openly butchers the spirit of Rule of Law.”

The Court held further

The court gave the officials a second chance to appear before it today (Tuesday), along with an affidavit outlining the grounds for disobeying its directives. The officials showed up in court today and submitted an affidavit promising to be cautious and decide the application. They have now been allowed another month by Justice Singh to abide by its directives.

The petitioner was represented by advocates NS Dalal, Devesh Pratap Singh, Alok Kumar, Rachana Dalal, Sweta Kadyan, and Vishvender Balhara.

Respondents were represented by advocate Yeeshu Jain, Jyoti Tyagi, Prabhsahay Kaur, and Aditya Pratap Singh.

[Read Order]

Shri Ishwar Singh v Land and Building Department and Anr.pdf
Tags: delhi high courtJustice Chandra Dhari Singh
ShareTweetSendShare

Related Posts

Sir P.V.R Reddy, IRS Rtd
APERC

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

May 6, 2025
News

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

May 26, 2024
Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp  is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court
News

Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court

February 13, 2024
Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.
News

Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.

February 13, 2024
The Supreme Court declines to stay the Madras High Court's ruling dismissing the challenge against Google Play's billing policy.
News

The Supreme Court declines to stay the Madras High Court’s ruling dismissing the challenge against Google Play’s billing policy.

February 12, 2024
election commission, supreme court news, Patna Court News, Clock Election symbol, NCP, Sharad Pawar, Ajit Pawar
News

Know More: Ajit Pawar Election symbol clock for NCP by the Election Commission

February 7, 2024
google news
google news

POPULAR NEWS

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino'z - know more

La Milano Pizzeria restrained  from representing previous association with La Pino’z – know more

May 20, 2022
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND LAWYER

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ADVOCATE AND A LAWYER?

June 4, 2022
Know About Registration Of The Partition Document Is Compulsory?

Know About Registration Of The Partition Document Is Compulsory?

January 1, 2024
Justices DY Chandrachud, AS Bopanna, and Bela M. Trivedi,

Execution of Document not to be considered based on Admission of Sign on Document Rules Supreme Court

May 12, 2022
multiple bar association enrollment

Can an Advocate Enroll for Multiple Bar Associations?

May 8, 2022

Tags

advocate Algo Legal Allahabad HC Allahabad High Court Anil Deshmukh anticipatory bail Appointment of Judges bail Bombay high court calcutta high court central government cji Collegium Collegium Recommendations contempt of court defamation delhi high court divorce Enforcement Directorate Gujarat High court Gyanvapi Mosque high court judges IPR Judicial Appointments justice bench karnataka high court kerala high court latest judgements law ministry legal news madras high court murder patna high court pil pocso act public interest litigation rajasthan high court Rouse Avenue Court Sequoia Capital study material supreme court Supreme Court Collegium supreme court of india Union Law Ministry varanasi court

APERC’s Landmark Ruling Balancing Regulatory Autonomy and Renewable Energy Goals

by S Sreedhar
May 6, 2025
0
Sir P.V.R Reddy, IRS Rtd
APERC

Precedent No. JB 2025 APERC OP 91 The APERC Headed by Hon'ble Sir P.V.R. Reddy, Member & Chairman (i/c) in...

Read more

Supreme Court Declines Order for ECI to Release Polling Booth Vote Counts

by S Sreedhar
May 26, 2024
0
News

On Friday, the Supreme Court declined to issue an interim order on a petition from the NGO Association for Democratic...

Read more

Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court

by S Sreedhar
February 13, 2024
0
Know More: Sending Demand notices through email or WhatsApp  is valid in cheque dishonor cases: Allahabad High Court
News

Is a legal notice sent through WhatsApp or email legal?

Read more

Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.

by S Sreedhar
February 13, 2024
0
Know More: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai has accepted a bankruptcy petition against Dream11.
News

National Company Law Tribunal,NCLT Mumbai,Dream 11

Read more

About

Justice Bench is one of the fastest growing news legal portal in India, for latest Latest Legal News india, Supreme Court judgement updates, High Courts Judgments updates,Law Firms News in india, Law School News, Latest Legal News india visit us.

Follow us

Latest Court News

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Online Internship
  • Courses
  • Videos

© 2022 JusticeBench  |  Privacy Policy  | Terms of Use

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In